综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
HongKong Comment(1)

'Academic freedom' not license to incite

HK Edition | Updated: 2017-08-25 06:47
Share
Share - WeChat

The jailing of young activists Joshua Wong Chi-fung, Alex Chow Yong-kang and Nathan Law Kwun-chung last week by the Court of Appeal has no doubt saddened many. This includes the compassionate judge Wally Yeung Chun-kuen himself, who admitted it was difficult to put young people with aspirations behind bars. It is not hard to understand why the public are now looking forward to the court giving a justified punishment to the initiators and masterminds behind the illegal "Occupy Central" campaign.

There is perhaps one bit of comfort for those who have transformed their empathy for the jailed young men to anger at the initiators of the illegal movement. The District Court will hear the case of Benny Tai Yiu-ting, Chan Kin-man and Chu Yiu-ming on Sept 19 after the three were arrested and charged for their roles in the 79-day street protest that brought some key parts of Hong Kong to a standstill in fall of 2014. The trio each faces three counts related to causing a public nuisance.

It is the business of the court to decide whether the three are guilty or not. But it is the business of Hong Kong to keep our educational institutions, particularly the city's top universities, free from political demagogues. By inciting young people to deliberately violate the law and misguiding students to undermine the rule of law - the cornerstone of Hong Kong's economic prosperity and social stability - those demagogues are deemed by many unfit to continue teaching in university.

Voices urging the removal of those demagogues from their posts in the universities and other educational institutions are growing. The top administrators of those institutions have so far refrained from taking action despite the rising public pressure. This is presumably because of fears that they might be accused of obstructing academic freedom.

But they might have erred on the side of caution. What those demagogues did that led to the disruptive and lengthy street protests in the fall of 2014 has nothing to do with academic activities but everything to do with infringing upon the rights of thousands of innocent citizens and undermining the rule of law.

Maneuvers such as drafting the action plan for the "Occupy" campaign and publishing articles and delivering speeches that incite people to participate in the illegal protests are definitely not part of academic freedom. This unmistakably refers to "the freedom of teachers and students to teach, study, and pursue knowledge and research without unreasonable interference or restriction from law, institutional regulations, or public pressure", according to Encyclopedia Britannica.

(HK Edition 08/25/2017 page12)

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
萍乡市| 广德县| 张家港市| 平顶山市| 连云港市| 潼关县| 洛川县| 开江县| 那坡县| 石家庄市| 双桥区| 石柱| 兴仁县| 花莲市| 长寿区| 巴塘县| 手机| 黎川县| 普兰店市| 阳新县| 甘肃省| 孟村| 衡东县| 昌邑市| 行唐县| 宜兰县| 定安县| 东至县| 陇南市| 三明市| 阿拉尔市| 南昌县| 沙雅县| 徐汇区| 长垣县| 施秉县| 祁东县| 德安县| 甘泉县| 将乐县| 酉阳|