综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Editorials

Politicizing pandas, whatever next?

China Daily | Updated: 2022-02-17 08:29
Share
Share - WeChat
9-month-old male giant panda cub Xiao Qi Ji climbs in a tree at the Smithsonian National Zoon on May 19, 2021 in Washington, DC. [Photo/Agencies]

Nancy Mace, a Republican in the United States House of Representatives, has introduced a bill in Congress to prevent US-born giant pandas from being returned to China so as to "give freedom to the pandas", The New York Times reported on Monday, saying the move was intended to send a message to China that pandas should not be used as "shop windows".

During then-US President Richard Nixon's historic visit to China in February 1972, China presented two giant pandas to the US as a gesture of friendship from the Chinese people. Since the arrival of the first pair of giant pandas 50 years ago, pandas have enjoyed huge popularity in the US and become a symbol of friendly exchanges between China and the US.

It would have been unimaginable until recently that some US politicians would try to politicize pandas. Mace's move reveals that the "anti-China syndrome" in Washington has reached a critical mass, and there is no limit to the ridiculous lengths some politicians will go to prove their anti-China bona fides.

There is a very strict contract between China and the US on the leasing of the giant pandas, which cannot be changed by a unilateral act of the US. Washington has always touted the "spirit of contract" and labeled China a "rule-breaker". Mace's bid to detain the pandas in the US on the pretext of "human rights abuses" by China shows that the so-called spirit of contract in the mouths of US politicians is really a cover up for banditry.

The attempt to politically manipulate the public's love of pandas is also bound to arouse suspicion and disgust among ordinary US people.

And it is not only in the US, people around the world love giant pandas, and the image of giant pandas as "messengers of friendship" has long been deeply rooted in people's hearts. Just as Susan Shirk, director of the 21st Century China Center, University of California, San Diego, said in an interview with The New York Times, if passed, Mace's bill could damage the "mutually beneficial" cooperation among panda lovers all over the world.

Even The New York Times could not deny the giant pandas' popularity in the US, saying that the "pandas benefit US zoos by bringing in more people and revenues". In attempting to politicize the pandas, the "imagination" of some US politicians has added a ridiculous new dimension to the "anti-China farce" being staged by some in Washington.

Mace's bill shows that their imagination is now bankrupt and they have run out of tricks to attack China.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
五家渠市| 合水县| 盐源县| 金堂县| 修水县| 苏尼特左旗| 伽师县| 宜昌市| 伊春市| 南平市| 张家口市| 嘉峪关市| 屏山县| 福州市| 彝良县| 丹江口市| 香港| 邓州市| 临西县| 勃利县| 长丰县| 宁远县| 麻江县| 绥江县| 长顺县| 凯里市| 静宁县| 毕节市| 安陆市| 台山市| 肥城市| 杨浦区| 壶关县| 河北省| 弥勒县| 应城市| 泽库县| 溧水县| 当阳市| 西和县| 辽源市|