综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

CHINA> National
Mixed reaction to WTO ruling
By Ding Qingfen and Liu Wei (China Daily)
Updated: 2009-08-14 07:00

* The ruling, if approved by WTO, would adversely affect the two importers of foreign films. But other companies hailed the ruling.

* It's understandable China takes measures to protect the film industry from being invaded by foreign products, said an associate professor from Beijing Film Academy.

China may appeal a ruling by the World Trade Organization (WTO) that would break up a monopoly of two State-owned firms as the sole foreign audiovisuals importers.

A WTO dispute settlement panel, in a report released yesterday, ruled that China's practices were inconsistent with international trade rules, and that China needs to revise them.

The US filed the case two years ago. The case involves publications, audio and video products, and music download services imported by China.

Related readings:
Mixed reaction to WTO ruling China regrets WTO ruling on publications restrictions
Mixed reaction to WTO ruling WTO upholds US complaint over China's film, music, book imports
Mixed reaction to WTO ruling China files WTO complaint on EU anti-dumping measures
Mixed reaction to WTO ruling China requests WTO panel to probe US poultry import ban 
Mixed reaction to WTO ruling 
China should learn to apply WTO dispute mechanism

The ruling, if approved by WTO, would adversely affect the two importers of foreign films. But other companies hailed the ruling.

"It is good news for private companies. We would like to join in. The game was unfair, but I believe complete competition is coming," said Wang Zhonglei, president of Huayi Brothers, China's leading privately owned media company.

The Chinese government has appointed China Film Group and Huaxia Film Distribution to import and distribute audiovisuals from abroad.

This, as the US claimed, has not only run against the fundamental WTO rules requiring equal treatment between local and foreign businesses, but also breached the commitment China made when it joined the WTO to open up sales and distribution.

"China has been performing its duty on publications market access, and we have been providing unblocked access to overseas imports of audiovisual products," the Ministry of Commerce said yesterday on its website.

"We regret the dispute panel did not turn down the US."

China has imported approximately 500,000 titles of publications of all kinds every year since joining the WTO in 2001, as promised in its entry agreement.

Under the WTO framework, the US and China must decide within two months whether to appeal any part of the ruling.

"We will carefully evaluate the report," the ministry said.

The ministry's Department of Treaty and Law, which is responsible for the issue, refused to comment.

Lin Xiaoxia, associate professor from Beijing Film Academy, defended China's policies.

"Film in China can be hardly a pure commercial product. Its educational and social functions are still important. It's understandable China takes measures to protect the film industry from being invaded by foreign products, especially when ours is still too weak to compete," Lin said.

But Tao Jingzhou, a partner of US Jones Day, a leading international law firm, said China has little chance of winning an appeal.

The American Chamber of Commerce China also hailed the ruling.

 

 

彰化县| 商水县| 钟祥市| 安宁市| 清水河县| 溧水县| 扎囊县| 宝丰县| 从江县| 孟连| 桦川县| 射洪县| 合水县| 醴陵市| 米泉市| 洛宁县| 额济纳旗| 陕西省| 墨脱县| 桦南县| 伊宁县| 蚌埠市| 青田县| 若尔盖县| 通榆县| 海门市| 新巴尔虎右旗| 宝清县| 格尔木市| 六安市| 大冶市| 隆德县| 穆棱市| 建德市| 镇平县| 阜平县| 龙陵县| 左云县| 汶川县| 大足县| 仙居县|