综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

  .contact us |.about us
News > National News...
Search:
    Advertisement
Officials forced to appear in court
( 2003-07-19 09:09) (China Daily)

Shenzhen, a special economic zone in South China's Guangdong Province, issued a rule early this month to force government officials to appear in court in certain kinds of administrative cases.

The rule aims to ensure that officials can no longer avoid appearing in administrative cases without specific reasons.

Administrative litigation centres on whether or not a specific administrative act is legitimate under China's Administrative Procedure Law.

Since the enactment of the Administrative Litigation Law 13 years ago, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of administrative cases.

However, in practice, the heads of administrative bodies being sued are seldom seen in court. Only about 0.1 per cent of administrative directors who are charged have eventually appeared in court.

Considering a court appearance as humiliating and not fitting in with their official status, some leading officials of administrative bodies tend to be reluctant to appear in court or even hostile to the idea.

This may partly explain why administrative leaders seldom defend administrative litigation cases in court in person.

The frequent absence in court of administrative heads in administrative cases has not only eroded the government's credibility but also the authority of the law.

From the perspective of legal principles, as the legal representative of an administrative body, the head or director should turn up in court. However, the previous unwritten requirements were unclear and non-binding and gave those officials the very excuse they needed to appearing in as defendants. This resulted in large numbers of trials in administrative cases having to be abandoned.

Without a precise and definite legal interpretation defining the conditions under which administrative heads have to appear in court, officials could not be put under scrutiny in such cases and held accountable within a legal framework. This seriously tarnished the fairness of the law and affected the efficiency with which the law was implemented.

It is in this respect that Shenzhen's new rule is of great significance.

 
Close  
   
  Today's Top News   Top National News
   
+China's richest village: It takes brains and guts
( 2003-08-19)
+Relief for indigent college students
( 2003-08-19)
+Leaders meet Australian PM
( 2003-08-19)
+New security official promises open mind
( 2003-08-19)
+Government to rationalize auto sector
( 2003-08-19)
+Public bidding to purchase medical equipment
( 2003-08-19)
+Support urged for national organ donation
( 2003-08-19)
+Offenders get wider re-education
( 2003-08-19)
+Measures to ease emergencies
( 2003-08-19)
+Rodents hit northwest China
( 2003-08-19)
   
  Go to Another Section  
     
 
 
     
  Article Tools  
     
 
 
     
   
        .contact us |.about us
  Copyright By chinadaily.com.cn. All rights reserved  

鄂托克旗| 奉节县| 泗水县| 江北区| 卫辉市| 新乐市| 铜山县| 棋牌| 沙坪坝区| 会昌县| 依安县| 西平县| 安庆市| 韩城市| 宾阳县| 高台县| 昌邑市| 凤山县| 龙胜| 肥乡县| 磴口县| 凌海市| 阿尔山市| 溧水县| 吉林省| 太仆寺旗| 马龙县| 鲁山县| 安塞县| 阳信县| 高阳县| 永善县| 通榆县| 郁南县| 华池县| 禄劝| 喀喇沁旗| 和林格尔县| 双鸭山市| 胶州市| 庄浪县|