Kay: No evidence Iraq stockpiled WMDs ( 2004-01-26 09:46) (Agencies)
U.S. intelligence agencies need to explain why
their research indicated Iraq possessed banned weapons before the
American-led invasion, says the outgoing top U.S. inspector, who now believes
Saddam Hussein had no such arms.
"I don't think they exist," David Kay said Sunday. "The fact that we found so
far the weapons do not exist — we've got to deal with that difference and
understand why."
David Kay, special advisor to the
CIA in the search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, is seen in
a July 31, 2003 photo. Kay, the former top U.S. weapons inspector in Iraq,
said Sunday, Jan. 25, 2004, he believes Saddam Hussein had no weapons of
mass destruction before the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.
[AP]
Kay's remarks on National Public Radio reignited criticism from Democrats,
who ignored his cautions that the failure to find weapons of mass destruction
was "not a political issue."
"It's an issue of the capabilities of one's intelligence service to collect
valid, truthful information," Kay said. Asked whether U.S. President
Bush owed the nation an explanation for the gap between his warnings and
Kay's findings, Kay said: "I actually think the intelligence community owes the
president, rather than the president owing the American people."
The CIA would not comment Sunday on Kay's remarks, although one intelligence
official pointed out that Kay himself had predicted last year that his search
would turn up banned weapons.
Kay said his predictions were not "coming back to haunt me in the sense that
I am embarrassed. They are coming back to haunt me in the sense of `Why could we
all be so wrong?'"
The White House stuck by its assertions that illicit weapons will be found in
Iraq but had no additional response on Sunday to Kay's remarks.
Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., said Kay's comments reinforced his belief that the
Bush administration had exaggerated the threat Iraq posed.
"It confirms what I have said for a long period of time, that we were misled
— misled not only in the intelligence, but misled in the way that the president
took us to war," Kerry, a White House contender, said on "Fox News Sunday." "I
think there's been an enormous amount of exaggeration, stretching, deception."
Hans Blix, the former chief U.N. inspector whose work was heavily criticized
by Kay and ended when the United States went to war with Iraq, said Sunday the
United States should have known the intelligence was flawed last year when leads
followed up by U.N. inspectors didn't produce any results.
"I was beginning to wonder what was going on," he told The Associated Press
in a telephone interview. "Weren't they wondering too? If you find yourself on a
train that's going in the wrong direction, its best to get off at the next
stop."
Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said
he was surprised Kay "did not find some semblance of WMD" in Iraq. Roberts said
a report on Iraq intelligence, to be delivered to his panel Wednesday, should
help clarify the CIA's prewar performance.
"It appears now that that intelligence — there's a lot of questions about
it," Roberts said on CNN's "Late Edition."
In October 2002, Bush said Iraq had "a massive stockpile of biological
weapons that has never been accounted for and is capable of killing millions."
In his television address two days before launching the invasion, Bush said U.S.
troops would enter Iraq "to eliminate weapons of mass destruction."
Kay returned permanently from Iraq last month, having found no biological,
nuclear or chemical weapons nor missiles with longer range than Iraq's
troublesome president, Saddam Hussein, was allowed under international
restrictions.
But on Sunday, Kay reiterated his conclusion that Saddam had "a large number
of WMD program-related activities." And, he said, Iraq's leaders had intended to
continue those activities.
"There were scientists and engineers working on developing weapons or weapons
concepts that they had not moved into actual production," Kay said. "But in some
areas, for example producing mustard gas, they knew all the answers, they had
done it in the past, and it was a relatively simple thing to go from where they
were to starting to produce it."
The Iraqis had not decided to begin producing such weapons at the time of the
invasion, he concluded.
Kay also said chaos in postwar Iraq made it impossible to know with certainty
whether Iraq had had banned weapons.
And, he said, there is ample evidence that Iraq was moving a steady stream of
goods shipments to Syria, but it is difficult to determine whether the cargoes
included weapons, in part because Syria has refused to cooperate in this part of
the weapons investigation.
Administration officials have sent mixed signals in recent days about the
hunt in Iraq for illicit weapons.
While Bush's spokesmen have insisted weapons will yet be found, U.S. Vice
President Dick Cheney and Secretary of State Powell held open the possibility
that they will not.
Cheney warned in March 2003, three days before the invasion: "We believe he
(Saddam) has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons."
But in an interview Wednesday with NPR, he said of the weapons search: "The
jury is still out."
Kay's comments echoed those of dozens of Iraqi scientists who, in recent
interviews with The Associated Press, claimed they had not seen or worked on
weapons of mass destruction in years.
Only a handful of Iraqi scientists who worked in former bioweapons and
missile programs remained in custody by the time Kay left Iraq in December. Some
of the detained scientists have been held since April and Kay's conclusions were
likely to raise their hopes for release.
Kay said he resigned Friday because the Pentagon began peeling away his
staff of weapons-searchers as the military struggled to put down the Iraqi
insurgency last fall.
Kay hopes to draw on his experiences to write a book on weapons
intelligence.
