综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

In the press

Updated: 2013-09-20 15:34

(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small

Timing and tough measures

The "tough measures" taken by the SAR government to cool the overheating property market have effectively slowed the rise of housing prices but also led to a dramatic fall in property transactions, which sometimes number just a handful per day. In response to calls for lifting the restrictions Financial Secretary John Tsang Chun-wah told the press on Wednesday that the "tough measures" are still necessary for now to prevent property prices from soaring irrationally again, and he hopes the Legislative Council (LegCo) would pass them as soon as possible, but they will be ended when the time is right.

It is now becoming more and more popular for governments to set preconditions for lifting market-control measures and none is more evident than the US Federal Reserve (Fed), which noted at its regular meeting in March that it would not end quantitative easing as long as inflation is 2.5 percent or higher, and the jobless rate above 6.5 percent. This is undoubtedly a plus in terms of transparency and offers the market a good barometer for making predictions. But what does it mean for Hong Kong's property market? When exactly is the right time to lift the anti-speculation curbs?

To answer the question one must consider the anti-speculation curbs are "extraordinary measures" in "extraordinary times" aimed at cooling the overheating market to prevent the asset bubble it creates from bursting and reducing the impact it has on people's well-being. That means the curbs will remain until the property market returns to normal, which of course concerns a number of factors. The first one is definitely market price, which raises the question: How high is reasonable? There is also the question of how much the price level should to be adjusted, and what if the fall is too steep, etc.

Another key factor is financial risk, which can issue from bad loans, negative assets and/or their impacts on property prices. Also to be considered is how soon the Fed will begin tightening money supply again and whether the influx of hot money will suddenly flow away. Then there is people's livelihood, which is directly linked to affordability and loan-repayment plans. Are we sure the target affordability level means people can buy properties and especially for youths who cannot even afford the first down payment?

Currently all signs indicate the time is not right to begin relaxing the restrictions, meaning the risk of an asset bubble burst is still high and the supply/demand ratio way off-kilter. Apparently now is not the best time to ease the "tough measures".

This is an excerpted translation of a Hong Kong Commercial Daily editorial published on Sept 19.

(HK Edition 09/20/2013 page9)

淄博市| 鹤壁市| 舟曲县| 宝坻区| 盐池县| 汉沽区| 汽车| 鄯善县| 龙陵县| 武宣县| 望城县| 资溪县| 隆昌县| 措美县| 岑溪市| 吴江市| 和田市| 二连浩特市| 谢通门县| 清水河县| 白银市| 章丘市| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 崇阳县| 阜城县| 三江| 洪湖市| 麻城市| 治多县| 金山区| 铜梁县| 望江县| 新竹县| 嵊泗县| 界首市| 延川县| 遵义县| 平江县| 贵南县| 泌阳县| 新巴尔虎右旗|