综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

'Occupy Central' has lost public credibility

Updated: 2014-08-20 07:16

By Leung Lap-yan(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small

The Alliance for Peace and Democracy (APD ) announced before the anti-"Occupy Central" march on Sunday that at least 1,170 civic groups had said they would join the event.

The number of participants has been estimated at more than 126,000. The actual number of participants exceeded 190,000 according to APD's estimate, which would have covered more than five soccer fields at Victoria Park.

It is without doubt the strongest display of popular will since the handover 17 years ago. It was an important follow-up to the anti-"Occupy" petition organized by the APD.

More than 1.5 million people signed the petition to express their opposition to "Occupy Central" and their support for implementation of universal suffrage in accordance with the Basic Law.

Hong Kong society has clearly rejected the illegal "Occupy Central" movement with a resounding "No!"

The anti-"Occupy" march demonstrated the following characteristics:

'Occupy Central' has lost public credibility

1. It was a large public rally organized by purportedly apolitical members of society - those with no apparent political preference or material incentives. Many participants were members of the "silent majority" and had probably never protested like this before.

2. Although the more than 190,000 participants in the anti-"Occupy" march was nowhere near the half million the opposition has claimed over the years, this number is held to be an accurate figure. It has not been exaggerated or inflated. The more than 1.5 million signatures collected by the APD outnumber the questionable 780,000 "votes" in the unfiltered online "referendum" organized by "Occupy Central". It also exceeds 70 percent of the total number of legitimate votes in the most popular democratic election in Hong Kong's history. This clearly represents mainstream opinion in the city.

3. The anti-"Occupy" march can be seen as the first accurate public response to the opposition's claim that it has a monopoly on popular support. It was the first major public protest by the pro-government, pro-establishment and ostensibly pro-Beijing camp since the handover. It is perhaps now clear which side dominates the political scene. This will prove significant when assessing the future political situation in the SAR.

The opposition camp has always considered itself in command of the popular will with a ratio of 6:4 (opposition 6 to pro-establishment 4). After a while even some pro-establishment parties were convinced by opposition's claims. They became afraid of voicing their political views. Some would rather remain neutral than express their political beliefs. Some had already conceded defeat even before the actual showdown began. But the anti-"Occupy" march confirmed that the true political situation in Hong Kong is quite different from what the opposition claims. This should be remembered as a turning point in the rise of the pro-establishment camp.

No doubt "Occupy Central" has lost the war as well as the battle. A majority of Hongkongers would appear to oppose "Occupy Central". The illegal movement has lost much public support. The opposition camp should abandon it and admit defeat. They should not treat the public with contempt. "Occupy Central" is not only an illegal movement that will hurt the public and the opposition camp itself, but also a bad bet. It will cost "pan-democrats" all their political chips. For the "occupiers" it is now game over!

The author is a veteran current affairs commentator.

(HK Edition 08/20/2014 page9)

历史| 什邡市| 武宣县| 当雄县| 赤峰市| 晋州市| 原平市| 额济纳旗| 建宁县| 衡阳市| 寿宁县| 瑞安市| 沙田区| 天水市| 临高县| 休宁县| 师宗县| 佳木斯市| 景宁| 三亚市| 哈巴河县| 同心县| 诏安县| 奉节县| 柳林县| 神木县| 偏关县| 海林市| 依安县| 英山县| 那坡县| 北海市| 开封市| 师宗县| 贞丰县| 上栗县| 博乐市| 沙洋县| 游戏| 上犹县| 中宁县|