综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
China
Home / China / View

PLA participation in RIMPAC a milestone

By Chen Weihua | China Daily | Updated: 2014-06-27 07:21

The 2014 Rim of the Pacific, or RIMPAC, naval exercises began in and around the Hawaii Islands on Thursday. They are a milestone in US-China relations, especially their military-to-military ties, as it is the first time the Chinese navy was invited to participate in the drills, which involve 22 nations, 47 ships, six submarines, more than 200 aircraft and 25,000 personnel.

Four Chinese naval vessels, including the missile destroyer Haikou, the missile frigate Yueyang, the supply ship Qiandaohu, the hospital ship Peace Ark, and a total of 1,100 officers and sailors make the Chinese navy's participation the second-largest after that of the host nation, the United States.

The Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy is participating in seven programs, including artillery practice, sea security operations and military medical exchanges between the Peace Ark and US Navy hospital ship Mercy.

The invitation, first extended by former US defense secretary Leon Panetta in September 2012, was significant because China has been excluded from earlier exercises, including the previous one in 2012 when most countries around China participated.

The exclusion of China undoubtedly increased Chinese suspicions that RIMPAC was targeting China, but the inclusion of the PLA Navy this time can help dispel such doubts.

A few weeks ago, many people were holding their breath, as it looked like the PLA Navy might cancel its participation due to the indictment of five PLA officers by the US Justice Department for the alleged cyber theft of US corporate secrets. Because military-to-military exchanges between China and the US have been damaged previously by incidents such as US arms sales to Taiwan, the NATO bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade in 1999 and the collision of a US EP-3 spy plane with a Chinese fighter jet in 2001, such worries were justified. However, both sides have learned that they should not let such incidents to spill over and damage their overall relations. This is indeed a sign of maturity in handling their complex and consequential relationship.

Both countries have accused the other of being reluctant to conduct military exchanges, but this just shows that both are eager for more exchanges. And I have heard that Chinese and American sailors have got on well on previous occasions, not only during the drills, but also in the after-drill basketball games or farewell parties, when there is a lot of ganbei-ing.

For a long time, the bilateral military-to-military relationship has lagged far behind other dimensions of the bilateral relationship, such as trade investment, and cultural and education exchanges. Yet, bilateral military exchanges in the past two years have been hailed by many as an unexpected bright spot in the relationship, with a growing number of high-level visits and joint exercises.

There is still much to be done, of course. The misunderstanding and distrust between the two militaries, as exemplified by the so-called Air Sea Battle Concept and the rampant US surveillance off the Chinese coast and the Anti-Access/Area Denial strategy of the PLA, are still cause for concern.

Any miscommunication or miscalculation between the two militaries could flare up and result in conflict, especially when they have close encounters at sea. Ship captains and sailors who have had joint exercises with the other are more likely to read the situation calmly and exercise restraint even in complicated situations.

There is no doubt that the US rebalancing to the Asia-Pacific, especially the military component, and the tensions over the territorial disputes in both the East China and South China seas have posed new challenges for the two militaries. And that means joint exercises, such as RIMPAC, have become more important so the two militaries prevent possible accidents and clashes.

It also means that the US Congress should review its related laws, such as the National Defense Authorization Act of 2000, which have greatly restricted bilateral military exchanges and cooperation, including how many of the RIMPAC programs the PLA Navy can participate in.

The author, based in Washington, is deputy editor of China Daily USA. chenweihua@chinadailyusa.com

 

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
道孚县| 海盐县| 武安市| 措勤县| 平江县| 明星| 平凉市| 迁安市| 尚志市| 盖州市| 丰原市| 双峰县| 龙江县| 巴林右旗| 黄平县| 清水河县| 建阳市| 贵溪市| 吉安县| 桂林市| 堆龙德庆县| 河南省| 文山县| 贺州市| 崇左市| 阳谷县| 深圳市| 福海县| 丹寨县| 柳江县| 平舆县| 凉山| 宁海县| 历史| 调兵山市| 宝兴县| 太康县| 海林市| 鄢陵县| 漠河县| 桃园市|