综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

We have launched E-mail Alert service,subscribers can receive the latest catalogues free of charge

 
 
You Are Here: Home > Publications> Articles

Conflicts in Rural Governance

2015-12-02

By Zhao Shukai, Development Research Center of the State Council

Over the past ten years and more since the turn of the new century, China's rural development has kept a sound momentum, with farmers' income increased rapidly, public product supply enriched, and rural residents' wellbeing remarkably improved. However, with regard to governance, rapid development has not brought sound governance, or if we could say, the governance quality has failed to rise to an extent compatible with economic and social development; governance quality is instead worsened in many aspects. The author holds that such phenomenon of "strong development but weak governance" has not only puzzled the public in understanding China's development, but also intensified social anxiety and unrest, thus leading to public puzzle over China's future performance. According to the author, this is mainly reflected as follows: first, development and governance are imbalanced. Currently, unsound performance in rural governance is mainly, viewing from the social perspective, demonstrated through intensified rural social conflicts and increased complaints by farmers against township government. As regards the government, the relationship between different levels of government has become rather tense, with less trust between various levels of governments as well as inadequate cooperation among them. Second, there is an intrinsic logical conflict with the system. The way to find out the reason for the occurrence and evolvement of China's social conflicts should focus on the government system itself. And third, system conflicts are chiefly reflected in the following four aspects: the system conflict relating to budget management, the system conflict concerning official management, the system conflict pertinent to government performance and accountability, and the system conflict between township government and primary-level self-governance.

 
For more detailed information, please refer to here.

 
会宁县| 留坝县| 淅川县| 舒城县| 太和县| 扬中市| 奇台县| 蛟河市| 馆陶县| 嵊州市| 北票市| 和田市| 游戏| 长沙县| 清水县| 富蕴县| 钟山县| 嘉峪关市| 扎囊县| 凤山县| 正安县| 夏津县| 阳泉市| 东丽区| 历史| 朝阳市| 南澳县| 伊春市| 阳朔县| 扶风县| 贵德县| 阳西县| 金昌市| 泸西县| 柳河县| 金昌市| 正阳县| 陆丰市| 长沙市| 沁水县| 贵定县|