综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

We have launched E-mail Alert service,subscribers can receive the latest catalogues free of charge

 
 
You Are Here: Home > Publications> Articles

Potential Risks in Local Government Investment and Financing Platforms Call for Transformation

2017-02-17

 

By Xu Pengcheng, DRC

2016-12-29

For a long time, local government investment and financing platform companies have played an important role in China’s economic growth whereas their development is accompanied with potential risks. As a result, it is a major and imminent task to make transformation of these platform companies.

First, current performance. To resist financial crisis in 2008 and boost local economy, local governments in China are encouraged to establish platform companies to attract banking credit, issue corporate bonds and medium-term notes and broaden financing channels by financial appropriations, land-use right transfer and equity investment. According to the motions made at the National People’s Congress and the report by the Ministry of Finance, the debt balance of local governments across the country reached respectively 16 trillion yuan in 2014 and 17.18 trillion yuan in 2016.

Second, main existing problems. 1. Inappropriate functions have left these companies vulnerable in independent management if the government does not provide support. They lack clear debt liability and are overloaded in operation. 2. Internal management is not standardized, including the composition of personnel, sources of funds and governance structure. 3. Inability in debt payment due to land revenue decline and a long cycle of fund return. 4. Improper regulations for company performance. 5. Imperfect legal systems. 6. Great difficulties in local debt-to-equity swap.

Third, existing risks. 1. Single source of funds and dependence on land revenue will trigger financial risks for platform companies. 2. The non-standardized credit rating and loan audit will lead to bank credit risks. 3. Local governments would bear financial risks as debtors and guarantors. 4. Economic fluctuations often exert a leverage effect in debts. Meanwhile, as important assets are often associated with land mortgage, local governments would have to push up housing prices, thus resulting in economic structural malformations.

 

For more detailed information, please refer to here.

 
易门县| 桦南县| 厦门市| 福贡县| 南靖县| 淮安市| 青冈县| 措勤县| 武强县| 黔江区| 离岛区| 文昌市| 中西区| 苗栗市| 台湾省| 黑河市| 嫩江县| 交城县| 宜兰县| 夹江县| 安丘市| 连山| 南华县| 虎林市| 合江县| 长子县| 梓潼县| 新和县| 东辽县| 谷城县| 南召县| 吴川市| 潜江市| 华容县| 双牌县| 淳安县| 宁明县| 罗江县| 陇川县| 若尔盖县| 凤城市|