综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Flattops come with benefits

By Wang Baokun (China Daily) Updated: 2011-08-19 07:57

China has developed its first aircraft carrier by refitting Varyag, an old Soviet flattop. But it has left some people worried whether the country's economic growth will continue to be strong enough to support the building of aircraft carriers in future and whether such a move will create enough economic benefits.

An aircraft carrier reflects a country's economic strength, technological development level and equipment manufacturing capacity. The cost of building an aircraft carrier depends on factors such as its quality, standard and design, the level of technical research and development and labor cost. It also depends on the era, building period and a country's economic and industrial development levels.

International experience shows that building aircraft carriers imposes a rather high demand on a country's economy. For example, a US Nimitz-class aircraft carrier costs about $4.5 billion. The maintenance cost during its 50-year service is about $12 billion, and the cost of fuel, about $6 billion. The maintenance cost of other vessels in an aircraft carrier's formation is about $7 billion, and about $20 billion is needed to replace the shipboards twice. If we take devaluation and technological reform into consideration to be 20 percent of the overall expenditure, the cost of a Nimitz-class flattops during its 50-year life cycle would be about $60 billion, that is, $1.2 billion a year.

The current US navy expenditure is more than $149 billion, with the costs of flattops being more than $16 billion and maintenance about $4.2 billion.

China paid $20 million for the old Varyag. The foreign media estimates that the total cost of a Chinese aircraft carrier, along with its formation ships and including transportation, refitting, equipment loading, operational aircraft, maintenance and disposal after decommissioning would be about $10 billion.

Whether such a high military expenditure be a drag on the Chinese economy can be evaluated on the basis of two key indicators: whether the proportions of the military budget in GDP and fiscal expenditure are below the generally accepted "safe levels" of 4 percent and 20 percent.

Last year, China became the second largest economy in the world with a GDP of $5.98 trillion. As the largest economy in the world, the US' GDP last year was $14.62 trillion.

According to The Wall Street Journal, the military expenditures of the US and China last year was about $698 billion and $119 billion, which accounted for 4.8 percent and 2.1 percent of their GDP. World Bank figures show that, from 1988 to 2009, the proportion of the US' military expenditure in GDP fluctuated between 3 and 6 percent, while that of China was about 2 percent. And according to data provided in China Statistical Yearbook, the proportion of the country's military expenditure in GDP in the past 10 years was about 1.5 percent, and from 1985 to 2010 the proportion of military expenditure in fiscal expenditure was about 8 percent.

On July 8, the US passed a $649-billion defense budget for next year. If we add the nearly $33-billion budget for nuclear weapons' project and army infrastructure construction, the US' total military budget would be $682 billion, or 18 percent of its fiscal expenditure even when it is facing a crisis.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

New type of urbanization is in the details
...
石狮市| 万年县| 松溪县| 阿拉善盟| 革吉县| 古浪县| 青海省| 中卫市| 虞城县| 彭州市| 江山市| 德保县| 渝北区| 榆中县| 西丰县| 饶平县| 安徽省| 定南县| 临城县| 枣强县| 麦盖提县| 大理市| 清水县| 临沂市| 长海县| 库车县| 临朐县| 沙雅县| 普兰店市| 饶平县| 班戈县| 龙井市| 庄浪县| 阿拉尔市| 闻喜县| 获嘉县| 南城县| 宁化县| 乌恰县| 扬中市| 长治县|