综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Press

Prohibiting taxi drivers from driving out of town is unreasonable

chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2013-01-29 22:18

Local authorities should not solve livelihood problems at the expense of taxi drivers' legal rights, according to an article in Beijing Youth Daily. Excerpts:

As Spring Festival approaches, Guangzhou and Zhenjiang governments have launched a new policy to alleviate the taxi shortage in their cities during Spring Festival.

Local authorities may have good intentions, but the method they have adopted is too arbitrary and unreasonable. In Guangzhou and Zhenjiang, taxi drivers sign leasing contracts with taxi companies and pay them rental fees monthly. Within the leasing period, taxi drivers have the right to operate independently. Such contracts are protected by law.

But local authorities arbitrarily intervene in taxi drivers' operations through administrative means. Guangzhou authorities have stipulated that if taxi drivers take taxes out of town, their contracts with the taxi companies will be terminated.

Local authorities intervene in taxi drivers' operations through administrative means that have no legal basis. This is an example of how administrative power tramples citizens' legal rights arbitrarily. The new policy that seems benefits local citizens is actually at the cost of violating taxi drivers' rights.

There are many other ways to ease the taxi shortage in local cities without trampling the rights of taxi drivers who come from other areas, such as providing free bus transportation during Spring Festival and encouraging citizens to use public transportation. Or the authorities could pay the rental fee during Spring Festival for taxi drivers, in order to encourage drivers from other areas to stay in the cities during the holiday. Whatever method local authorities adopt, it should not be at the cost of taxi drivers' legal rights. Administrative power should not go against the law, otherwise it will face criticism similar to the backlash that Guangzhou and Zhenjiang authorities have experienced.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
汶川县| 阿巴嘎旗| 孟津县| 深州市| 舞钢市| 会同县| 雷波县| 仁寿县| 汝南县| 南丰县| 林西县| 岚皋县| 洛宁县| 和林格尔县| 永德县| 尤溪县| 客服| 中西区| 余干县| 大埔区| 商都县| 平原县| 汶川县| 丰原市| 清徐县| 南通市| 梅州市| 共和县| 天镇县| 陈巴尔虎旗| 荆门市| 清丰县| 芦溪县| 西平县| 遂昌县| 阿图什市| 东源县| 大埔区| 济南市| 浪卡子县| 平乐县|