综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Press

Nine proves for 1,000 yuan

chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2013-02-05 20:49

It is reported that a worker in a dental clinic in Shenyang city, the capital of Liaoning province, turned to labor arbitration to get her back wages, which were about 1,000 yuan ($160). But, she was informed that nine documents of proof are needed before arbitration officials can create a file for her, and the staff there even told her to "be prepared since it may take several months to finish the whole process without a certainty of getting her money back." It is a shame that our society cannot protect workers' rights in a timely manner, says an editorial in Beijing News. Excerpts:

To seek back wages of 1,000 yuan, nine documents of proof are required, a task that is complicated and difficult for a common worker, not to mention migrant workers.

Labor arbitration is a kind of quasi-judicial procedure, so it is right to require some evidence. However, nine documents of proof is a lot for a common worker asking for back pay.

Moreover, the reason many migrant workers have back-pay issues is that they don't know how to protect themselves. They might not sign a legal labor contract with their employers or keep related evidence of their working statuses, and some bosses use these as excuses to deny wages. Therefore, it is unreasonable to ask workers to submit so much proof — an obstacle for them to get their back pay.

What happened in the labor arbitration organization is not merely a simple case of bad service. It is dereliction of duty. The proof needed in the arbitration law includes timecards and payroll lists, which are all quite difficult for migrant workers to get. Therefore, when dealing with cases involving migrant workers and other vulnerable groups, the labor arbitration organization should actively contact the employers to get proof, rather than requiring the workers to submit the proof for them.

We should blame not only the bad behavior of bosses for the problem with migrant workers' back pay. Dereliction of duty in government sectors should be investigated as well. Take the case in Shenyang, for example. There are three local government organizations responsible for this issue. But none is working actively to help workers.

Maybe it is time to change their behavior first, and then it will be possible to solve the problem with back wages.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
桂林市| 武城县| 桑日县| 长乐市| 枣庄市| 上虞市| 东乡县| 金昌市| 砀山县| 元阳县| 宝清县| 隆回县| 武功县| 伽师县| 仙游县| 清新县| 盐城市| 盐城市| 顺平县| 博野县| 竹北市| 黔西| 桑日县| 九寨沟县| 武川县| 黔东| 弋阳县| 喀喇沁旗| 辽宁省| 甘洛县| 兴和县| 宁南县| 宁德市| 夹江县| 枣强县| 黑龙江省| 瑞昌市| 永定县| 侯马市| 静海县| 米脂县|