综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

World / South China Sea

Why tribunal's arbitration initiated by the Philippines is against international law

(Xinhua) Updated: 2016-06-30 13:45

BEIJING - The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague said on Wednesday that a tribunal with widely contested jurisdiction will issue an award on July 12 on the South China Sea case unilaterally initiated by the Philippines.

China does not accept nor is it a participant in the arbitration, and will never recognize the so-called "award," as it is illegal, null and void for the following reasons.

First, "Pacta sunt servanda" - or maintaining agreements - is a basic principle in international law. However, the Philippines' unilaterally initiation of the arbitration violates its agreement with China to resolve any dispute through bilateral negotiations.

On the basis of bilateral agreements and the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC), China and the Philippines have chosen negotiation as the means to resolve their disputes rather than arbitration.

The Philippines initiation without acquiring China's consent contravenes its international obligations to China.

Second, the unilateral initiation by the Philippines violates the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

The UNCLOS stipulates that nothing impairs the right of states to settle a dispute through means of their own choosing and further procedures will be applied only where no settlement has been reached between parties.

Given the fact that China and the Philippines have made a clear choice to settle their dispute through one-on-one negotiations, third-party settlement procedures are unapplicable.

Third, the Philippines' unilateral act violated the right that China enjoys a party to the UNCLOS to seek dispute settlements of its own choosing, and undermined the UNCLOS' authority and integrity.

Fourth, the Arbitral Tribunal has violated the UNCLOS and abused its power at will by hearing the case and exercising jurisdiction.

Worst of all, the Arbitral Tribunal has heightened tensions between China and the Philippines, affected the stability of regional and international maritime order, and contradicted its purpose of peaceful settlement of international disputes. In the end, it should have no say in the territorial dispute between the two countries.

Trudeau visits Sina Weibo
May gets little gasp as EU extends deadline for sufficient progress in Brexit talks
Ethiopian FM urges strengthened Ethiopia-China ties
Yemen's ex-president Saleh, relatives killed by Houthis
Most Popular
Hot Topics

...
日喀则市| 株洲县| 万年县| 庄浪县| 新平| 连云港市| 资中县| 云霄县| 南郑县| 确山县| 绥棱县| 马关县| 长治市| 阳信县| 庄浪县| 黑河市| 安溪县| 武鸣县| 全南县| 乐业县| 庆城县| 合阳县| 依安县| 海伦市| 承德市| 仲巴县| 阆中市| 甘孜县| 白银市| 拉萨市| 同心县| 定陶县| 房山区| 深泽县| 江陵县| 叶城县| 侯马市| 大连市| 大宁县| 乌兰浩特市| 文化|