综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Legal perspective of Great Wall death

By Xie Caifeng (China Daily) Updated: 2015-04-13 07:47

Legal perspective of Great Wall death

A section of the Great Wall at Badaling in the suburbs of Beijing was one of the most crowded scenic spots in China during the National Day holiday. [Photo/China Daily]

Last week, a 70-year-old Chinese woman from Heilongjiang province died on the Great Wall after she was knocked down by a tourist from Canada, who reportedly was running quickly down some steps.

Does this constitute a crime? The answer varies. The district police governing the place where the incident happened concluded it was a pure "accident" after their investigation. Therefore, the police did not launch a criminal investigation but guided the woman's family and the Canadian woman into civil mediation.

However, many Chinese netizens suspect the police providing favorable treatment to the tourist because of her nationality. Frankly, it is a common mindset among some Chinese because the government offered favorable treatment to foreign enterprises and citizens during the early years of opening-up.

And several legal experts have argued that running down the steps constitutes negligent homicide according to Chinese criminal law, as it is an action that puts others at risk.

The crime of negligent homicide in China consists of four aspects, namely an action results in death, the act itself, the causal relationship between the action and the death, the action was committed because of gross negligence. The last element usually is the most decisive one. It assumes a person has a duty not to engage in an action that may foreseeable be of danger to others.

It is hard to give a firm conclusion based on the reported facts and details. But the reasonable assumption is that a running person may bump into others and hurt them, but not kill them.

There are two common ways to settle a civil dispute, amicable mediation or court judgment. In either case, the Canadian woman should provide monetary compensation to the injured party either in the spirit of equitable liability principle or fault liability principle according to Chinese law. The total sum is usually hundreds of thousands of yuan subject to the merits of each case. If two parties cannot reach a consensus on compensation, the injured party may file a case with a court.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

...
土默特左旗| 乐都县| 巩留县| 建昌县| 义乌市| 滦平县| 都安| 贵州省| 桂林市| 陕西省| 汨罗市| 镇雄县| 阿拉善右旗| 甘孜| 榕江县| 栾川县| 榆中县| 桐柏县| 武定县| 固原市| 云梦县| 左权县| 汝城县| 祁门县| 炎陵县| 广昌县| 永定县| 安顺市| 大化| 富川| 灌南县| 武穴市| 宣汉县| 承德市| 花莲县| 南陵县| 凉城县| 克什克腾旗| 中宁县| 阿合奇县| 眉山市|